Florida Building Commission

Product Approval / Manufactured Buildings
Program Oversight Committee (POC)

MINUTES

December 8th 2008 – 3.00 pm to 5:23 pm

               Embassy Suites Tampa
3705 Spectrum Blvd | Tampa, Florida 33612-9412 | Tel: 1-813-977-7066  

Product Approval POC Attendees: Ed Carson- Chair, Herminio Gonzalez, Paul Kidwell, and Jeffrey Stone. Staff present: Azhar Khan, Mo Madani, Jeff Blair Rick Dixon and Jim Richmond. Ted Berman, Product Approval Administrator was also present.

There was a quorum.

1. Agenda and minutes from October 6th were approved as presented.

 

2. Manufactured Buildings Program Issues

A. Manufactured Buildings Program Budget

Staff presented to the Committee the Manufactured Buildings Program Budget illustrating the drop in revenue and the fees spent on the contract for monitoring.

 

B.  The POC discussed the need for legislative authority for establishing Manufactured (Modular) Building Program Administrator.  Staff presented the case for the Manufactured Building Program Administrator due to possible staff reduction and budget cuts which will impact the Department’s ability to continue the current management structure of the Manufactured Building Program.  The intent is to contract out the manufactured buildings program similar to the state product approval program. Staff requested that the Commission support such legislative authority.

 

POC Action:   The POC recommends that the Commission support the Department’s initiatives to request legislative authority for the following:

 

1:  Contract the manufactures building administrator responsibilities;

2:  Manufacturers pay the vendor directly for plans review and inspection services via the Building Code Information System;

3:  Department will establish plan review and inspection fees.

 

3. Product Approval Program Issues

A. Product Approval and Entities Statistics Report

Staff presented the current entities and product statistics from inception of the program.


B. Product Approval Administrator’s Performance survey

Staff presented to the Committee the Survey Results.

 

C. Statutory authority for manufacturers / entities to pay the Product Approval Administrator directly via the BCIS.

 

POC Action:

The Committee moved to approve Staff request for specific authority for manufacturer / entities to pay vendor directly via BCIS.

 

D. Revocations for the following products:

The Committee voted to defer the item to the next meeting directing staff to conduct more research on the subject.

 

FL

Mfg Name

3941-R1 6331 9945 9946 9947

Uroll Shutters

5486, 5497

TNT Roofing Manufacturer

7140, 7617, 7618

Atlantic Windows and Doors, Inc.

 

E. Standard Equivalency between ASTM 1300-2 to ASTM E 1300-04 with limitations as applied to laminated glass as identified in the engineering report

 

Staff informed the committee of the report from the Structural TAC.

 

The Structural TAC recognized equivalency of ASTM E 1300-02 to ASTM E 1300-04C with limitations as applied to laminated glass as identified in the engineering report.

 

F. Complaint filed against FL 5343 by Michael J. Wolfe of Advanced Shelter Solutions

 

Michael J Wolfe of Advanced Shelter Solutions was present at the meeting to present his case.

The committee voted to dismiss the complaint due to lack of substantive material evidence necessary to conduct an investigation.

 

G. Complaint filed against FL 7350 and FL 9328 by Steve Sincere, PE.

 

POC Action:

The Committee voted to dismiss the complaint due to the fact the Florida Board of Engineers voted to dismiss the case.

 

H. Deadlines for Product Approval Applications for 2009.

 

The Committee made changes to the deadlines for the Feb meeting.  The deadlines were adjusted forward 4 days to allow for more review time due the holidays.

 

I. Develop criteria for evaluation entity approval and adopt by Rule or develop recommendation for 2009 legislature for entities to be recognized by law.

 

The Committee agreed with the staff recommendations below:

 

(1)   IAPMO Evaluation Service (ES) is accredited by ANSI as a certification agency meeting ISO 65. (Please see the attached accreditation certificate on page 24) Therefore, it is the staff recommendation that IAPMO by recommended by the Commission for inclusion in the law as an approved evaluation entity.

 

(2)   Change the law to read as follows:

(a) Evaluation entities that meet the criteria for approval adopted by the commission by rule. The commission shall specifically approve the, the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials Evaluation Service,  the International Code Council Evaluation Services, the Miami-Dade County Building Code Compliance Office Product Control and National Evaluation Service, the international Conference of Building Officials Evaluation Services, the Building Officials and Code Administrators International Evaluation Services, the Southern Building Code Congress International Evaluation Services. Architects and engineers licensed in this state are also approved to conduct product evaluations as provided in subsection (5).

            Note:  Staff will organize the entities listed above alphabetically.

J. Height of Rollup Shutters.

 

Structural TAC made the following recommendation to the Committee

 

One cannot assume that larger height of roll-up shutters other than tested will perform as the tested size.  Engineering is required to substantiate the increase in height beyond the tested size. 

Note:  Under the High Velocity Hurricane Zone because of the deflection limit required by the code, roll-up shutters approved by Miami-Dade Code Compliance Office are not allowed to exceed three times the tested height.

 

The POC directed the Administrator to contact the affected manufacturers to advise them to make changes to their applications necessary to comply with the above findings. This would exclude product approvals that are based on certification through Miami Dade NOA. 

 

K. Update on Investigation of FL 8843

 

Ted Berman, Product Approval Administrator, informed the Committee of his findings.

 

POC Action:

Based on the administrator’s findings that the issue in question is outside the scope of Rule 9B-72 and the lack of substantive material evidence, the Committee voted to dismiss the investigation.

 

L. Discuss and provide comments to the rule development workshop on December 15th 2008 for Rule 9B-72.090 and 9B-72.180

 

POC Action:

The committee voted in favor of the staff recommendation to provide comment at the workshop to allow the upload of an attachment for the self-affirmation method in the Building Code Information System.

 

The committee also voted to provide comments at the workshop to allow the standard equivalencies to the following standards:

DASMO108-02 to DASMA 108-05

TPI 1-02 to TPI 1-07

ASTM E 1300-02 to ASTME E 1300-04

                                                                                          

M. Investigation of Improper Validations

 

Validations for FL1865 and FL2617 were performed on an incorrect checklist.  The Committee asked the Administrator to send the validator a warning letter to avoid this from happening again.

 

4. Declaratory Statements:

DCA08-DEC-339 by Jose Sanchez, Fenestration Testing Laboratory, Inc

 

More information is required.

The committee deferred action on this Dec Statement to the February meeting requesting the presence of the petitioner to provide more information.

 

5. Review product approval applications:  FL 11095 and FL 11561

 

The Committee made the following recommendations:

FL 11095 – recommend conditional approval

FL 11561 – recommend approval

 

6. Adjourn

The Committee adjourned at 5.23 pm.

 

Actions needed by the Commission:

Product Approval POC:

1. The Committee recommends the products and entities listed in Administrator's report be approved, deferred, conditionally approved or denied as per voted on by the Committee.

 

2. The POC recommends that the Commission support the Department’s initiatives to request legislative authority for the following:

 

1:  Contract the manufactured building administrator responsibilities;

2:  Manufacturers pay the vendor directly for plans review and inspection services via the Building Code Information System;

3:  Department will establish plan review and inspection fees.


3. The POC recommends that the following entities be recognized by law:

 

            (a) Recommend that IAPMO be recommended by the Commission for inclusion in the law as an approved evaluation entity.

            (b) Change the law 553.842 Product Evaluation and Approval to read as follows:

(a) Evaluation entities that meet the criteria for approval adopted by the commission by rule. The commission shall specifically approve the, the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials Evaluation Service,  the International Code Council Evaluation Services, the Miami-Dade County Building Code Compliance Office Product Control and National Evaluation Service, the international Conference of Building Officials Evaluation Services, the Building Officials and Code Administrators International Evaluation Services, the Southern Building Code Congress International Evaluation Services. Architects and engineers licensed in this state are also approved to conduct product evaluations as provided in subsection (5).

            Note:  Staff will organize the entities listed above alphabetically.

4. The POC recommends that the Commission approve Staff request for specific authority for manufacturer / entities to pay vendor directly via BCIS.

 

5. Complaint filed against FL 5343 by Michael J. Wolfe of Advanced Shelter Solutions

 

The committee recommends that the Commission dismiss the complaint due to lack of substantive material evidence necessary to conduct an investigation.

 

6. Complaint filed against FL 7350 and FL 9328 by Steve Sincere, PE.

 

The Committee recommends the Commission dismiss the complaint due to the fact the Florida Board of Engineers voted to dismiss the case.

 

7. Update on Investigation of FL 8843

 

Ted Berman, Product Approval Administrator, informed the Committee of his findings.

Based on the administrator’s findings that the issue in question is outside the scope of Rule 9B-72 and the lack of substantive material evidence, the Committee recommends that the Commission dismiss the investigation.